Fast food has fueled America for years, a habit it has enjoyed. People everywhere grab quick burgers or fries, and it happens daily. Its convenience and taste were reasons folks always loved it. But the fast food business situation is shifting dramatically now. What seemed so strong is hitting problems, you could say. High sodium and fat content worry people, especially younger folks now. Consumers want different things, and big chains are struggling badly.
Many food chains feel pressure; this is for sure true. One huge, old company seems to be in really deep trouble. People wonder if it will survive or change fast enough. Its number of stores is shrinking while sales are dropping quite a bit. The reasons show that it needs big changes or it will perhaps fail.
1. **The Persistent Erosion of Footprint**: The country’s biggest fast-food chain faces real challenges now. It keeps closing restaurants throughout the United States, you know. This isn’t new; it has been happening steadily for years. It points to a deep problem, not just a short-term issue. This old chain, famous for its footlong subs, has lost stores. That drop is more than worrying; it shows contraction. Closing places indicates problems with past plans or profitability.
It provides a harsh reminder for everyone in the fast-food industry. This chain was once the largest in terms of location count here. Now it is actively reducing its presence. This wasn’t a one-time decision; it keeps closing stores. It means that past growth was either too rapid or not profitable enough. The real question is how many more will close and when this will stop.
2. **Shedding Hundreds of Locations in a Single Year**: Numbers tell a true story for this chain right now. The figures from 2024 especially reveal the problems it is facing. QSR Magazine reported that 631 outlets were lost in the U.S. that year. Hundreds of stores closed, and places vanished from neighborhoods. Losing over six hundred stores quickly means real trouble. Each closure means lost jobs and reduced presence for people. It shows a business facing huge pressure right now.
This fast pace of closures proves that the situation feels urgent. Companies do close underperforming stores, yes, that’s what they do. But losing over six hundred in one year is systemic. A large part of their stores was no longer viable. They struggled deeply with money, traffic, and operating challenges. Keeping them open just wasn’t possible anymore for them.
3. **Falling Below a Critical 20-Year Benchmark**: These many closures now represent a symbolic and sad milestone. It is like an anti-milestone, people might say. The chain ended 2024 with 19,502 U.S. outlets. This put it below 20,000 stores for the first time in two decades. QSR Magazine also shared this information and added that it was not just a number; it was a retreat to old levels.
Reaching this number clearly shows the chain’s decline. For two decades, it had 20,000 stores or even more. That proved its growth and its power in the market. Falling below this number shows a significant change and reverses the growth. This number matters; it changes how large the chain appears. It truly highlights the difficult problems this chain faces today. Getting back to 20,000 stores seems far away now.
4. **An Eight-Year Streak of Contraction**: This decline is not new; it’s been a pattern for a decade. Franchise reports say 631 stores nationwide closed in 2024. That makes it eight straight years of store closures. You cannot ignore eight years of shrinking like that. Eight years of losing stores paint a grim, sustained picture.
It shows that the problems are not temporary; they persist, and this is true. The company hasn’t been able to fully reverse them. Each year’s closures add up, reducing the chain’s presence for people. Almost 8,000 fewer stores exist since 2016; imagine that.
5. **Accelerated Decline in the Wake of a Global Event**: Closures were happening but peaked during a major global event. The contraction was worst during the pandemic years, perhaps it was. The chain saw many stores close in 2020 and 2021. This period made the negative trend even stronger for the chain. The pandemic added unique challenges for all businesses, you know. But for a chain already struggling, it greatly accelerated the process.
Closures worsened due to fewer customers, changed habits, and various problems. More vulnerable locations went under; they lost money, and this is true. Many businesses did well or adapted during this time. But the significant closures of Subway stores truly revealed its specific weaknesses. Existing issues combined with the pandemic created a dire situation for it. This caused many locations to close rapidly, unlike its competitors.
6. **Significant Losses Pre-Dating the Pandemic**: Remember, the pandemic did not initiate these closures for the chain. The chain was already shrinking before 2020, indeed it was. Many losses also occurred before the pandemic arrived. It closed 1,108 restaurants in 2018 and 996 in 2019. These figures are substantial in themselves. They occurred during times that were economically quite stable then.
Numbers from 2018 and 2019 show that problems always existed. They caused damage even before the global health crisis emerged. Closing over a thousand stores in one year indicates significant issues. Franchises couldn’t remain viable, independent of pandemic pressure.
Shrinking so rapidly before the pandemic started was a worrying sign. Market changes, internal issues, or competition took a great toll. The pandemic merely exacerbated the existing decline for the chain. It pushed closure numbers even higher in subsequent years.
7. **A Sliding Scale of Revenue**: When stores close, money usually drops too, and it does. This chain’s finances confirm this ongoing trend. In 2024, it made $9.5 billion in U.S. sales. Restaurant Business provided this particular number, as it did before. That is a big number, but it is down from last year. Specifically, it’s a 3.8% drop from 2023’s overall sales.
A nearly 4% U.S. sales drop hurts a big company badly. It shows that the remaining locations are struggling to sell products now. Fewer customers, smaller orders, or other factors cause this. A drop in money leads to a vicious cycle, you see. Low sales mean franchisees make less profit, leading to more closures. It harms the company’s health, limiting funds for improvements. Fewer sales confirm that they need huge changes quickly now.
8. **Multiple Pressures Leading to Closure**: Why exactly are all these places closing down? Many factors working together are causing this situation. Closures result from low sales, contract changes, and model reviews as well. This isn’t a single issue; it’s a web of problems. Low sales make places less profitable, pushing owners to close them. Contract changes suggest that bigger structural problems exist now. It’s also about the relationship between the company and store operators.
Maybe new contracts are worse, or the old model has failed. It’s hard for owners in today’s market; that is true. The company admits it is reviewing its U.S. stores now. It hopes the stores are in the right locations and run by the right people. This shows that they know past opening decisions have caused problems. Fixing the course is a huge task with almost 20,000 locations.
9. **The Unexpected Global Footprint Expansion**: You may only see bad news happening close by. The Unexpected Global Footprint Expansion reveals a strange surprise in its history. Stores shutting down here contrast with its massive international growth. It makes you question how one happens while the other explodes. Global locations saw positive net growth for the second year running. Just think for a moment about the number of locations added.
Over 10,000 units were added outside the U.S. in the past three years alone. This huge expansion brought the global tally to nearly 37,000. It is now the world’s third largest after McDonald’s and Starbucks. While Americans are skipping it, others everywhere are lining up. This paints a picture of a company facing a specific problem at home.
This international success becomes an important part of the entire puzzle. It shows that the brand name still carries significant weight. The business model can work, just perhaps not here right now. A company spokesperson highlighted this growth amidst domestic declines. The brand is not dead; it is just maybe facing U.S. issues. It is confusing to watch failure here but success elsewhere.
10. **Rolling Out the Red Carpet for a Fresh Look**: Simply acknowledging challenges does not fix anything right away. You actually must do something significant about problem areas. This chain is trying hard to push forward a fresh new look. They call this updated store design the ‘Fresh Forward 2.0’. It intends to give restaurants the needed facelifts for ambiance improvement. This was mentioned in a November 2024 press release.
The new prototype focuses on changing the internal restaurant vibe. They are talking about vibrant decor and warmer wood tones inside. The idea feels simple, making the place more inviting now. If the place looks better, maybe people will want to stay. It signals that this is not the same sandwich shop from decades ago. The company is trying to catch up with more modern styles.
Global Chief Development Officer Mike Kehoe feels the design stands out. He thinks it has the potential to make the greatest impact. It brings marketing, culinary, and digital efforts to the forefront, he said. They have tested this new appearance in several places. The feedback from guests and workers was positive overall. This is a step showing that crumbling infrastructure is an issue.
11. **Getting With the Digital Times**: Updating old chains means finally embracing needed technology. Getting With the Digital Times is part of the Fresh Forward 2.0 effort. It involves a technology push, not just warmer wood tones. Ordering everything from your phone makes counter service less appealing. Some workers felt the environment could be unbearable, as the context states.
The new prototype aims to improve Subway’s digital game. This means self-serve kiosks are now taking complex orders. You can punch in your specific sandwich order there. Order-ready screens show when the food is ready for pickup. This cuts down on awkward waiting or hovering around. These features seem basic but represent a necessary evolution for the chain.
Bringing digital efforts to the forefront is critical, as the officer noted. It caters to modern customers who value speed and accuracy. Minimal interaction is good for quick lunch purchases today. Integrating technology across thousands of locations is a large undertaking. It is non-negotiable when competing with chains that have mastered digital ordering. It shows attempts to build a bridge to the future as the past crumbles.
12. **Playing Real Estate Tycoon with the Footprint**: Closing thousands of stores forces one to look at why a location existed. This chain admits that it is actively reviewing its U.S. presence. These are not random closures; there is a stated strategy behind the locations that are bleeding. They hope that the remaining or new stores are in the right places. Getting Playing Real Estate Tycoon with the Footprint right helps.
A spokesperson describes the process of optimizing the footprint strategically. This involves a data-driven approach, they explained clearly. Data helps identify doomed locations and those that will survive. It shows where new stores should open based on the data. They now focus on location, image, format, and franchisee selection. A bad owner can sink a store faster than anything else.
CEO Kirk Tanner noted that meeting customers is difficult in the U.S. environment. He said that traffic and dollar share have stayed stable despite the challenges. This strategic review is part of that same effort. It concentrates presence where profit makes sense locally. It is a painful, drawn-out process when nearly 20,000 places exist. But it is essential to stop the bleeding and build a stable future base.
13. **The Ghost of Scandals Past**: Operational issues are important, but image problems remain. You cannot discuss the chain’s struggles without mentioning the PR disaster years ago. The context points out that the chain never seemed to recover fully. This happened after Jared, its spokesperson, was jailed and the allegations against him proved true. This blow was fundamental to the brand image built on trust.
Jared Fogle was the spokesperson; he embodied the message. He was the personification of the ‘eat fresh, lose weight’ idea. His fall from grace tainted the core brand message. How can one trust a company when the face of its health message fails? The context says one can easily read about his fall elsewhere. This event was clearly notorious and very damaging.
Time has passed, yet the shadow of the scandal lingers for people. It greatly eroded the foundation of the brand’s selling proposition. Being a healthier fast-food option was their niche. Coupled with the competition, the Jared controversy made people walk away. They felt that the ‘healthy‘ image was perhaps just a facade.
14. **America’s Changing Appetite: Beyond Burgers and Subs**: This chain’s struggles happen in a wider context that you see. They result from a shift in what Americans want to eat. Crucially, it involves how they want to consume food. Remember when nobody cared much about sodium or fat? Those days are fading fast, especially among younger people now.
Context notes that younger folks care more about nutritional quality. This is a big problem for giants built on indulgence. High sodium and high fat are now often red flags. This change significantly undermines the traditional fast-food business model. Chains must adapt quickly or they will soon become irrelevant.
The rise of alternatives now better meets new demands. Meal prep services, mentioned in the context, are gaining popularity. People get meals tailored to their tastes and needs. This offers convenience without guilt or mystery ingredients. It was not a widespread option twenty years ago. Now, it is a major competitor taking customers that fast food needed.
15. **It’s Not Just One Chain: Wendy’s Feels the Pinch Too**: This is not just a single company’s epic failure. Look at what’s happening elsewhere in the fast-food market universe. Even major players are being impacted by shifting trends now. Take Wendy’s, for example; they did not start 2025 well. The context states that they reported a 2.1% sales dip. This was during the first quarter of 2025 compared to the year before.
The total sales figure landed slightly below analysts’ projections. That start was really not good for the company. Adjusted earnings per share held steady at 0.20 euros. That figure did hit the market forecasts correctly. But the overall picture for them was not rosy. They had actually cut their EPS estimates for the entire fiscal 2025. The initial forecast was between 0.98 and 1.02 euros. They lowered it to a range of 0.92 to 0.98 euros. The context explicitly states that this correction reflects a complicated consumer environment.
This mirrors the issues plaguing the chain we discussed earlier. They face difficulty attracting customers and driving U.S. sales. Like other chains, Wendy’s saw positive international sales. Their international division sales rose nicely by 8.9%. CEO Kirk Tanner highlighted this, noting that traffic and share remained stable. But the need to lower projections shows that major players are feeling the heat.
16. **Analysts Divided: A Picture of Market Uncertainty**: The performance of chains like Wendy’s shows broader uncertainty now. This uncertainty hangs over the fast-food market, and the financial world reflects it. Quarterly results from Wendy’s elicited a mixed reaction from analysts. Opinions are divided, showing that the situation is volatile for everyone. Analysts Divided: A Picture of Market Uncertainty captures this.
Firms are adjusting valuations, but without a clear consensus evident. Morgan Stanley maintained an ‘Underweight’ rating on the shares. They lowered the price target from 14 to 13 euros. This is not exactly a vote of confidence for the company’s future. But JP Morgan surprisingly upgraded its rating from ‘Neutral’ to ‘Overweight’. Though they also cut their target from 17 to 15 euros. Stephens & Co. stayed with an ‘Equal-Weight’ rating. They kept their price target steady at 14 euros.
This range of reactions underscores the turbulent nature of the market. Some analysts see challenges ahead for the sector. Others might bet on growth or turnarounds eventually. It’s a messy landscape far from being a profitable gravy train. This reinforces the idea that easy money is gone from fast food. Some chains stuck in the past might fade away sadly.
Related posts:
Neither McDonald’s nor Burger King: The famous U.S. chain that could close
What’s Behind the Fast Food Decline in ID, WA, and Utah?
This massive U.S. fast food chain closed more than 600 stores in past year alone
