For over a decade, self-checkout technology has been a cornerstone of the modern retail experience, promising streamlined shopping and reduced operational costs. Retailers initially embraced these systems with enthusiasm, viewing them as a powerful combination of convenience and cost-effectiveness. The appeal was clear: shoppers could control their pace, especially during quick trips, and stores could process more transactions with fewer staff. This seemed like a win-win solution, poised to transform how we interact with our local supermarkets and big-box stores. Yet, what began as a revolutionary promise has, for many shoppers, evolved into a complex set of challenges, leading to growing dissatisfaction and prompting a significant reevaluation by retail giants like Walmart. The honeymoon period, it seems, is undeniably over.
Indeed, the initial widespread adoption of self-checkout was not without its merits. For many, the ability to bypass traditional lines, especially when purchasing just a few items, represented a tangible improvement in their shopping journey. The control offered by these machines resonated with a segment of consumers who valued speed and autonomy. However, as these systems became more prevalent, the narrative surrounding self-checkout began to shift, revealing a myriad of drawbacks that many retailers hadn’t fully anticipated during their initial implementation phase. The convenience factor, once so celebrated, started to be overshadowed by a host of frustrations that are now driving major retailers to reconsider their strategies.
Walmart, a behemoth in the retail world with over 4,700 stores in the U.S. alone and more than 10,600 worldwide as of 2025, finds itself at the epicenter of this evolving discussion. While self-checkout has become increasingly common across its U.S. locations, it has also become a lightning rod for shopper discontent. The retailer faces a difficult balancing act, as Santiago Gallino, an associate professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, points out: “Too few staffed registers can frustrate customers who prefer traditional checkout, while an over-reliance on self-checkout can introduce inefficiencies and revenue loss.” This sentiment perfectly encapsulates the tightrope retailers are walking, attempting to satisfy diverse consumer preferences while optimizing their operational models.
Across social platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit, shoppers are not shy about voicing their grievances. The complaints paint a vivid picture of the everyday frustrations encountered at Walmart’s self-checkout lanes. One North Carolina shopper lamented on X, “Hey @Walmart, how come you don’t have ANY registers open at 8:30 am? Now I gotta check out an entire cart in a very small area. Do better. How about offer a discount to those who self checkout?” This highlights a common issue: the perceived forced migration to self-checkout even when traditional options are scarce.
Another X post from a Glenmont, New York, Walmart location detailed a similar experience, with the shopper complaining about closed lines and a backup at self-checkout. The individual noted that lanes marked “15 items or less” were suddenly being used by customers with over 15 items, causing further delays. This scenario, where policies seem to shift on the fly or are inconsistently enforced, adds to the sense of chaos and frustration. These anecdotal reports are not isolated incidents; they represent a significant undercurrent of dissatisfaction among a broad segment of Walmart’s customer base. The expectation of a quick, efficient self-checkout often dissolves into prolonged waits and operational confusion.
Further online complaints illustrate the varied nature of these self-checkout woes. A February 11 post on X mentioned long lines at registers with no self-checkout options at a Montgomery, Alabama Walmart, indicating that the problem isn’t just about forced self-checkout, but also about a general lack of available checkout options. Meanwhile, a shopper in Florida with only three items expressed frustration over the lack of an express lane or cashier, prompting them to post, “I need to rethink where I shop.” These instances, while seemingly small, chip away at customer loyalty and highlight a growing disconnect between retailer offerings and consumer expectations.
In response to these public complaints, the Walmart Help account has consistently engaged with posters, asking them to send direct messages with details of their experiences, stating, “You should always have a smooth experience! Could you please send a DM with details?” This indicates an awareness of the issues and a stated commitment to addressing individual concerns, even if the systemic problems persist. It’s a testament to the power of social media in bringing localized frustrations to the company’s attention, compelling them to respond directly to their customers.
Walmart’s official stance has generally emphasized that decisions regarding self-checkout and staffed registers are highly localized. The company stated to USA TODAY that these choices are “made at the manager’s discretion and are based on several factors, including feedback from associates and customers, shopping patterns and business needs in the area.” Kelsey Bohl, senior manager of corporate communications at Walmart, reiterated this to TODAY.com, explaining that store managers have the autonomy to make decisions based on what works best for their specific store, employees, and customers, adjusting based on traffic and staffing levels. This decentralized approach allows for flexibility but can also lead to inconsistencies in the customer experience from one store to another.
For instance, a store might begin its day with only staffed checkouts and then open self-checkout registers as customer traffic and associate staffing increase. This process, according to Bohl, “isn’t new,” despite the recent surge in social media attention. While these adjustments are presented as routine operational decisions, the rising volume of public complaints suggests that their impact on the customer experience is becoming more pronounced, leading to increased scrutiny and frustration. The perceived scarcity of traditional checkout options and the sometimes abrupt closure of self-checkout lanes are clearly irking shoppers.
Read more about: A Baker’s Honest Take: I Compared 15 Grocery Store Apple Pies, And Only One Made the Cut for My Kitchen
Beyond just managing customer flow and staffing, a more complex and persistent problem looms large for retailers utilizing self-checkout: revenue loss from theft and incorrect sales, often referred to as “shrink.” This issue has been a significant driver behind many of the recent changes. A 2023 Lending Tree survey revealed that 69% of shoppers believed self-checkout technology made it easier to steal, and a concerning 15% admitted to having shoplifted at self-checkout. Furthermore, a broader Lending Tree survey found that 23% of U.S. adults have shoplifted, underscoring the scale of the problem.
The context explicitly mentions incidents like Costco cracking down on membership card checks at self-checkout in the summer of 2023, not only to curtail card sharing but also to reduce “shrink.” Walmart itself took a firm stance, banning a woman from all its U.S. stores after she was accused of using a self-checkout scam to shoplift items like ramen noodles. These examples highlight that the perceived efficiency of self-checkout comes with a significant financial vulnerability for retailers, compelling them to implement counter-measures.
Adding to the frustration are the technical glitches and operational quirks that often plague self-checkout machines, transforming the promise of speed into an illusion. Common complaints revolve around malfunctioning scanners, overly sensitive weight sensors that trigger alerts for seemingly minor discrepancies, and the frequent need for employee assistance to resolve issues. Many customers report feeling stressed and rushed, especially when dealing with large quantities of items or age-restricted products that require staff verification. These technical hitches not only slow down transactions but also erode the perception of self-checkout as a convenient option.
The demographic divide in self-checkout adoption is also becoming increasingly apparent. While younger, tech-savvy shoppers might navigate these systems with relative ease, older customers or those less comfortable with technology often struggle with the interface and requirements. This creates a two-tiered shopping experience, where a portion of the customer base feels marginalized or inadequately served by the automated options. The expectation that all shoppers will adapt seamlessly to self-service technology is proving to be overly optimistic, leading to further customer dissatisfaction and calls for more human-assisted options.
Read more about: Beyond Bargains: How Walmart is Revolutionizing Retail to Captivate Affluent Shoppers
Indeed, the promise of faster checkout times has often proven illusory. Technical difficulties, machine malfunctions, and the learning curve associated with proper scanning techniques can frequently result in transaction times that are longer than, or at best comparable to, traditional cashier-assisted lanes. This defeats one of the primary selling points of self-checkout, leading to a sense of exasperation among shoppers who expected a quick exit from the store. When the technology fails to deliver on its core promise of efficiency, its value proposition is significantly diminished in the eyes of the consumer.
Beyond efficiency and theft, there’s also a more intangible, yet crucial, cost associated with the rise of self-checkout: the loss of the “human touch” at retail. As Santiago Gallino notes, “In grocery settings, self-checkout reduces opportunities for customers to engage with store employees – who can provide a friendly interaction, ask about their experience, and enhance overall customer satisfaction.” This loss of personal connection can detract from the overall shopping experience, turning a potentially pleasant interaction into a purely transactional one. For many, a friendly face and a brief conversation at the checkout are part of what makes shopping enjoyable.
In recent months, these accumulating concerns have led Walmart to make tangible adjustments. The retailer has removed self-checkout at select stores, though this affects only a “tiny fraction” of its total store base – “more than 10, but still only a tiny fraction of its total store base.” Specific locations cited for complete removal include Shrewsbury, Missouri; Cleveland, Ohio; three stores in New Mexico; and one in Los Angeles, California. This targeted approach indicates that the company is responding to localized issues rather than implementing a blanket policy across all its locations. It’s a data-driven strategy, focusing on areas where “theft rates and operational difficulties have reached unacceptable levels.”
Furthermore, some stores have implemented restrictions, making self-checkout available only to Walmart+ members and drivers of its Spark delivery service. This move aims to prioritize these specific customer segments, potentially offering them a faster and more exclusive experience. Additionally, Walmart has begun posting “Customer Hosts” at self-checkout lanes. These associates are tasked with guiding customers to available registers, assisting them through the checkout process, and answering questions. This initiative is designed to “help customers complete their shopping even faster,” acknowledging the need for human intervention even within the self-service model. These initial reactions and adjustments signal a clear shift in Walmart’s strategy, moving away from wholesale automation towards a more nuanced, managed approach that attempts to mitigate the problems that have emerged with self-checkout systems.
The conversation around self-checkout at retail giants like Walmart often centers on customer convenience and immediate frustrations. However, a deeper look reveals complex economic realities and industry-wide shifts that are fundamentally reshaping the future of retail checkout. Far from a simple operational tweak, the ongoing re-evaluation of self-checkout is driven by a sophisticated interplay of financial pressures, evolving consumer behaviors, and the relentless pursuit of effective loss prevention. Understanding these underlying forces is crucial to grasping why retailers are making the significant adjustments we’re observing today.
Initially, self-checkout technology was heralded as a panacea for rising labor costs and long queues. Retailers were enticed by the prospect of operating with fewer employees, particularly during peak hours, thereby achieving significant cost savings. The allure was simple: less human interaction, theoretically less overhead. For some, the early estimates suggested a reduction in costs, making the substantial investment in equipment, installation, and initial training seem worthwhile. This economic model, focused on efficiency through automation, became a powerful driver for widespread adoption across the industry.
However, the glossy facade of cost-effectiveness began to chip away as unforeseen challenges emerged. Retailers discovered that the savings from reduced cashier staffing were often offset by a new set of hidden costs. These included increased maintenance for complex machinery, the need for more technical support staff to troubleshoot frequent glitches, and perhaps most critically, a significant rise in revenue loss due to theft and incorrect scanning—a phenomenon universally known in the industry as “shrink.” The initial investment, which ran into millions of dollars, now had to be weighed against these ongoing expenses, making the true return on investment far more ambiguous than first imagined.
The “shrink” factor, encompassing losses from theft, fraud, and administrative errors, has emerged as a paramount concern for retailers heavily reliant on self-checkout systems. The numbers paint a stark picture: a 2023 Lending Tree survey revealed that a staggering 69% of shoppers believed self-checkout technology made it inherently easier to steal. More unsettling still, 15% of those surveyed openly admitted to having shoplifted at self-checkout. Broader data from Lending Tree further indicated that 23% of all U.S. adults have engaged in shoplifting, underscoring the pervasive nature of the problem, and highlighting self-checkout as a significant vulnerability.
This issue extends far beyond deliberate acts of theft. “Honest mistakes” play a substantial role, with customers accidentally failing to scan items due to malfunctioning scanners, overly sensitive weight sensors, or simply a lack of familiarity with the system. Age-restricted products, for instance, often bypass the payment process due to the frequent need for staff verification, creating further loopholes. These seemingly minor discrepancies, when multiplied across thousands of transactions daily, accumulate into substantial financial losses for retailers. The perceived efficiency of self-checkout, in many cases, comes with a severe financial vulnerability that retailers are now compelled to address with increasingly sophisticated counter-measures.
In response, retailers are not merely shrugging their shoulders; they are actively researching and deploying advanced loss prevention strategies. The context highlights incidents like Costco cracking down on membership card checks at self-checkout in the summer of 2023, not solely to prevent card sharing but explicitly to reduce “shrink.” Walmart itself has taken firm action, banning individuals accused of self-checkout scams, like the woman who allegedly shoplifted ramen noodles. These examples illustrate a proactive stance against a costly problem.
The implementation of “Customer Hosts” at self-checkout lanes, as seen at Walmart, is another pragmatic response. These associates are not just there for customer service; they also act as a deterrent and an immediate point of contact for resolving scanning errors or potential theft. Beyond human oversight, the industry is rapidly exploring and implementing artificial intelligence (AI)-powered loss prevention tools. These technologies aim to monitor transactions in real-time, detect suspicious activities, and flag potential issues, moving beyond reactive measures to proactive prevention.
The shift is also visible in the evolution of surveillance. Security camera footage, as highlighted in employee TikTok videos, plays a crucial role. One employee, RéJean Allen, noted in an October 2021 TikTok video that “The slightest hand movement that looks like you’re stealing, that camera catches it and it puts it on the screen.” These systems are designed not just to record, but to actively monitor and alert staff to suspicious actions, even replaying video of attempts to bypass scanning. This level of technological integration demonstrates a serious commitment to securing checkout processes.
For the conscientious shopper, these heightened security measures underscore the importance of vigilance. Attorney Carrie Jernigan, in a TikTok video discussing the dangers, recommends using self-checkout only for a limited number of items and always using a debit or credit card instead of cash. She advises being “slow and intentional” when scanning to prevent missed items and even suggests holding each item up to the camera before scanning and bagging it. These precautions highlight that even innocent slip-ups can lead to accusations of petty theft, underscoring the legal ramifications of unintentional errors in an increasingly monitored environment.
Walmart’s adjustments are not isolated incidents but reflect a broader, industry-wide trend toward reassessing automation strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic undeniably accelerated the adoption of self-checkout as retailers sought to minimize human contact and manage staffing during an unprecedented crisis. However, as the world moved past the immediate pandemic era, shopping patterns began to normalize, and retailers started to realize that customer preferences had evolved in unexpected ways. The enthusiasm for wholesale automation has given way to a more cautious, nuanced approach.
Other major retailers have followed suit in questioning the efficacy of ubiquitous self-service technology. Target, for instance, has been cited by social media users for reducing self-checkout hours and implementing a 10-item cap on its self-checkout lanes. Dollar General has gone further, reducing self-checkout at most of its locations and removing it entirely from thousands of stores. Neil Saunders, managing director of retail at GlobalData, succinctly states that “Rising theft — part of what retailers call ‘shrink’ — is the primary reason self-checkout is being ditched in some stores and restricted in others.” This widespread recalibration indicates a collective acknowledgment across the industry that the one-size-fits-all approach to self-checkout is no longer sustainable.
Retailers are now recognizing the critical need for strategies tailored to specific store formats, customer demographics, product mixes, and local market conditions. The future of retail checkout experiences appears to be heading towards hybrid models that skillfully blend automated and human-assisted options. This balanced approach acknowledges the diverse preferences and comfort levels of different customer segments. While younger, tech-savvy shoppers might still prefer the autonomy of self-checkout for smaller purchases, a significant portion of the customer base—including older shoppers or those less comfortable with technology—appreciates the personalized service and assistance offered by a human cashier.
Reintegrating the human element is becoming a cornerstone of this evolving strategy. As Santiago Gallino, an associate professor at the Wharton School, rightly points out, “In grocery settings, self-checkout reduces opportunities for customers to engage with store employees – who can provide a friendly interaction, ask about their experience, and enhance overall customer satisfaction.” The loss of this “human touch” can detract from the overall shopping experience, reducing a potentially pleasant interaction to a purely transactional one. By adding more staffed lanes and deploying customer hosts, retailers aim to bring back that essential personal connection, improving overall satisfaction and fostering greater customer loyalty.
Indeed, research suggests that regular checkout customers often report higher satisfaction and loyalty compared to those who primarily use self-checkout. This effect is particularly pronounced with larger basket sizes, where the complexity of scanning many items or resolving issues becomes a greater burden on the customer. When customers perceive their effort at self-checkout as rewarding, loyalty can match that of regular checkout users, but this is often contingent on a smooth, error-free experience—a condition frequently unmet. The shift towards more human-assisted options, therefore, is not merely about addressing theft; it’s about re-prioritizing the quality of the customer journey.
Looking ahead, while traditional self-checkout may be undergoing significant changes, the underlying push for technological innovation in retail is far from over. Walmart officially states that it is “re-evaluating its self-checkout strategy” rather than completely abandoning it. The company is actively testing new technologies that aim to provide a seamless, cashier-less experience, drawing inspiration from models like Amazon Go. This includes implementing AI-powered systems, invisible barcode technology, and enhanced RFID with real-time scanning oversight, designed to make checkout both “smoother and smarter.”
The goal is to blend advanced technology with a thoughtful “human touch” to create a secure and efficient shopping environment. This means self-checkout might remain an option, particularly for Walmart+ members and Spark delivery drivers, who might be directed to exclusive lanes for a faster experience. However, these systems will likely be far more sophisticated, incorporating robust loss prevention tools and requiring less direct customer intervention for issue resolution. The ongoing competition in self-checkout technology, with major players like NCR, Zebra, and Toshiba, suggests that innovation in this space will continue, pushing towards more reliable and user-friendly solutions.
Read more about: 14 of America’s Most Expensive Grocery Stores: Are They Worth the Splurge?
Read more about: Move Over, Trader Joe’s We Found 12 Grocery Stores That Are Simply Superior
Ultimately, the path forward for retail checkout involves strategic adjustments and a balanced future. Self-checkout, despite its woes, is “here to stay” in the U.S., as Gallino notes, “with labor cost savings being a key driver – especially in managing peak-time demand.” However, its form and application will undoubtedly evolve. The goal is to create flexible checkout environments that can adapt to diverse customer needs while maintaining operational efficiency and stringent security standards. This pragmatic response, prioritizing effectiveness over mere technological novelty, marks a maturation in the industry’s approach to retail automation, promising a more refined and customer-centric shopping experience for everyone.
